Controversy Over DRS Absence in England vs. South Africa Test

England’s emphatic 286-run victory over South Africa in the one-off Test ended 2024 on a high note for the team as they gear up for January’s Ashes. However, the match was overshadowed by confusion and controversy, stemming from the lack of a Decision Review System (DRS), a decision criticised by players and pundits alike.

Former England bowler Alex Hartley described Annerie Dercksen's dismissal during the Test as "the right decision but the wrong process." The absence of DRS—a system that allows teams to challenge umpiring decisions—sparked debates, particularly given that it had been implemented during the preceding white-ball series in South Africa. Cricket South Africa (CSA) chose to exclude DRS for the Test due to its cost, despite recording profits of £35.9 million last year.

Key Moments of Controversy

From the second ball of the match, questions arose when South Africa's Marizanne Kapp believed she had dismissed Tammy Beaumont lbw. However, the appeal was rejected, and England’s openers went on to score 53 runs together.

Proteas captain Laura Wolvaardt later faced a contentious decision, being given out lbw on 65 despite appearing to have edged the ball. Furious, she left the field muttering her frustration and tapping her bat against her helmet—a reaction that led to a fine by the International Cricket Council (ICC).

The most debated incident occurred in South Africa’s second innings, when England appealed for a catch off Dercksen. Umpires referred the decision to the third umpire, akin to a review, despite DRS not being in use. The third umpire confirmed an edge, resulting in Dercksen’s dismissal. While the decision was correct, Hartley criticised the unclear process, emphasising that such incidents highlight the necessity of DRS in all international matches.

Reactions from Both Camps

England captain Heather Knight called the absence of DRS a reflection of the game’s status. 

She expressed her frustration at its omission: "I was pretty shocked when I found out in the umpire's meeting the day before, that we weren't going to have it," Knight told a news conference after England wrapped up victory.

"I think it's a real shame. You come to expect it as a player now, and I guess the reason is always money. But, particularly in Test cricket, where wickets are such a premium, it's a really important thing to have."

Proteas head coach Mandla Mashimbyi called the situation “bizarre” and lamented the lack of communication regarding the decision-making process behind Dercksen’s dismissal. He added that while the umpires likely believed their decision was correct, the absence of clarity left room for confusion.